Malaysia has succeeded in reducing its incidence of poverty from 5.5% in year 2000 to 0.4 % in 2018 (Department of Statistics Malaysia 2018). While it has done remarkably well in reducing poverty, narrowing inequality and uplifting the standard of living of its citizens, there are emerging areas of concern that require urgent attention, particularly on the well-being of the children.
Of concern is the nutritional status of Malaysia’s citizens.
The Global Nutrition Report 2018 provided by the Independent Expert Group (IEG) reported that Malaysia was among 41 countries of the 141 reported which had three burdens of malnutrition – obesity, stunting and anaemia.
In fact, Malaysia is the only member of ASEAN with all three burdens.
According to the report, Malaysia experienced the paradox of malnutrition: while children under five are increasingly stunted, more and more adults are overweight. Figure 1 shows that Malaysia has the highest percentage of obesity in the ASEAN region.
A 2018 study by UNICEF which collected data on 2,142 children living in low-costs flats across Kuala Lumpur, showed that 23% of children aged four are stunted, with 22% underweight and 32% wasting, or thinner than the average of their peers.
The combination of obesity, stunting and anaemia in Malaysia is of concern – and needs to be treated as such.
From the economics perspective, the triple burden of malnutrition has resulted in the poor and B40 to be caught in the Poverty-Nutrition Trap.
Health economists and nutritionists have long conducted the relationship between nutrition intake, wage rates and labor productivity, as expressed in the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis (EWH). This hypothesis postulated that low levels of nutrition will reduce workers productivity and wages. This in turn will lessen their purchasing power, and therefore, low levels of nutrition.
Nutritional deficiency indirectly reduces labour productivity by increasing susceptibility to diseases and infections. And without sufficient resources, they became trapped in the vicious cycle of the poverty-nutrition trap.
In Malaysia the problem is further compounded by the rising cost of living which has an impact on consumption and expenditure.
The minimum wage of RM1,100 a month or the median household income of RM3,000 for the B40 can hardly cover basic needs, particularly adequate nutrition.
Studies have shown that good nutrition is critical in the first 1,000 days of life (from conception to a child’s second birthday) because it affects children’s physical and cognitive development and can have other lasting consequences, including improved academic performance, and higher productivity.
The World Bank (2005) reported that the economic benefits from improving nutrition are substantial: (a) for individuals they average at least 10% of lifetime earnings, and (b) for the country, they can make a difference of 2-3% of Gross Domestic Product.
Given that nutrition programmes are fairly inexpensive and increase productivity and growth, their benefit-cost ratios can be as high as 200:1.
Clearly, Malaysia needs urgent action to address the root causes of the triple burden of malnutrition. It needs to invest in nutrition programmes particularly those which benefit the poor.
Eradicating extreme poverty and providing better nutrition to address hunger were recognised as part of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal 2 or SDG 2. The need for better nutrition aims to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture”.
The World Bank (2005) and the Food and Agriculture Organisation recognised that good nutrition is a pre-condition for a healthy and productive life; malnutrition in all of its forms imposes high economic, social and human development costs on individuals, households, communities and countries. (FAO, http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/overview/fao-and-the-post-2015-development-agenda/nutrition/en/).
The following are recommended in the short-terrm, as it is important to meet immediate needs of vulnerable populations:
- The government has introduced PEKA40 that involves health screening for those aged 50 years and above in the B40, medical devices aid, incentive to complete cancer treatment and transport cost incentives. PEKA40 should be extended to include nutrition screening of all children.
- Establish the Emergency Food Assistance Programme. The programme involves the establishment of Food Banks at housing areas. These food banks will be managed by the community, based on needs.
- Introduce a Food Debit Card (FDB) system . Each month, the Government deposits benefits directly into the household’s electronic benefit transfer (EBT) card account. The amount of benefits depend on the household’s size, income, and expenses. Households may use FDB to pay for food at supermarkets, convenience stores, and other food retailers, including certain pasar malam.
- White Paper – Tackling obesity in ASEAN, The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited, 2017, http://www.eiu.com/industry/article/605525844/white-paper—tackling-obesity-in-asean/2017-06-12
- World Bank (2005) Repositioning Nutrition as Central to Development: A Strategy for Large Scale Action (World Bank, Directions in Development series 2005). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NUTRITION/Resources/281846-1131636806329/NutritionStrategyBrochure.pdf
- UNICEF (2018). https://www.unicef.org/malaysia/media_urban_child_poverty.html
Dr. Madeline Berma is an economic analyst and a member of the Ministry of Education’s National Education Policy Committee
- This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Code Blue.