Finding The Equilibrium: Why Malaysia’s Health Care Needs Collaboration, Not Confrontation — Dr Raymond Choy

The solution lies not in litigation or finger-pointing, but in co-creating a new health care contract, one based on trust, transparency, and shared value.

The recent CodeBlue article about Malaysia’s health care landscape has underscored the undeniable truth that our system is under growing and immense pressure from all sides.

The New Straits Times also recently reported that medical inflation is projected to surge by 16 per cent next year, fuelled by the exodus of doctors and nurses, rising drug prices, and costlier technology integration.

Almost simultaneously, the CodeBlue article also highlighted a legal standoff between nine medical associations and a third-party administrator (TPA) over a “generic-only” medication policy.

Though these issues appear distinct, they stem from the same imbalance that a fragile ecosystem in which payers, providers, and policymakers may struggle to find common ground between cost containment for sustainability and quality care for accountability.

An Ecosystem, Not A Battlefield

Health care should never be viewed as a tug-of-war between stakeholders. It is a living ecosystem that is hugely interdependent, delicate, and constantly evolving.

In my opinion, payers, TPAs, providers, and regulators each play indispensable roles, and the system collapses if any one side dominates or disengages.

TPAs, for instance, are actually not the villains in this story. They play a vital administrative and financial coordination role managing claims, enforcing transparency, and helping employers and insurers handle rising costs efficiently.

When governed responsibly, TPAs contribute to sustainability by standardising billing, tracking utilisation, and providing essential cost data for future reform. in other words, better efficiency can be translated into better cost effectiveness.

At the same time, health care providers like clinic doctors, pharmacists, and hospitals remain the heart of the system. Their duty is to deliver care that is evidence-based, patient-centric, safe, effective, accessible, and sustainable.

Clinical autonomy is not about resisting oversight, but about ensuring that every patient receives the right treatment for their unique condition at the right time, free from purely financial limitations.

The Cost Conundrum

Malaysia’s private health care sector is being squeezed from both directions.

Hospitals face escalating operating expenses from wage pressures and technology upgrades, while insurers and corporates face unsustainable claims growth. Caught in between, patients risk paying the ultimate price which is higher premiums, limited coverage, and restricted treatment options.

If we allow this divide to widen, the entire equilibrium collapses. Private hospitals and clinics may struggle to retain talent or maintain quality, while employers may scale back benefits.

Ultimately, patients will flood back into the public sector, which is already stretched thin and battling its own shortages.

From Blame To Balance

It appears that the current discourse has been dominated by blame: doctors pointing to cost-driven interference and payers accusing providers of inefficiency and overcharging.

But sustainable reform will only emerge when each party acknowledges its shared responsibility. Payers and TPAs must continue to enhance transparency and fairness in managing health care costs to ensure that financial stewardship does not compromise patient care.

At the same time, providers need to align their clinical practices with value-based, data-driven care models that emphasise outcomes rather than volume, ensuring every treatment is both effective and efficient.

Meanwhile, government bodies and regulators play a crucial role in setting frameworks that align incentives across the ecosystem protecting clinical independence while maintaining affordability and access for patients.

Only through this collective alignment can Malaysia build a more balanced, accountable, and sustainable health care system, and not at each other’s expense.

Collaboration, Not Competition

In times of crisis, division is easy; collaboration takes courage. The solution lies not in litigation or finger-pointing, but in co-creating a new health care contract, one based on trust, transparency, and shared value.

Let us listen to understand, not to argue. Let us hold hands, not draw battle lines. Because at the heart of this debate lies one undeniable truth: our collective purpose is to heal, not just patients, but the system itself.

Dr Raymond Choy is a health care reform and digital health advocate.

  • This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of CodeBlue.

You may also like