One Year Into The Ebola Outbreak: From Hope To Despair — Trish Newport

If the Ebola response doesn’t gain public trust, more money won’t do anything.

Today (August 1) marks the one-year anniversary of the start of the 10th outbreak, and is not only still raging, it has become the world’s second largest Ebola outbreak in history.

I remember July 24th 2018 so clearly. It was the day the 9th Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was declared over. I had worked during the outbreak managing MSF’s (Doctors Without Borders) vaccination project.

It was the first time that the experimental Ebola vaccine was used at the beginning of an outbreak to try and help control the outbreak. The outbreak lasted less than three months, and I remember crying with joy and hope on July 24th when the outbreak was declared over. I naively thought that with this great vaccine the world would never have to face a large Ebola outbreak again. As has happened so many times in my humanitarian life, I was very wrong.

One week after the 9th Ebola outbreak in the DRC was officially over, the start of the 10th Ebola outbreak in the DRC was declared. Today marks the one-year anniversary of the start of the 10th outbreak, and it is not only still raging, it has become the world’s 2nd largest Ebola outbreak in history.

It has been a long, painful, deadly year for the population living in the Ebola affected areas in the DRC. Ebola treatment centres have been viciously attacked and destroyed, health workers have been murdered because they worked in the Ebola response, security forces “protecting” the Ebola response have killed civilians, and people continue to die of Ebola.

The “Ebola Response” is made up of the Congolese Ministry of Health, the WHO and other international organizations. One of the biggest problems in the outbreak is that the Ebola Response has never gained the trust of the local population.

The outbreak is happening in an area that has been plagued in recent years by conflict and massacres of the civilian population. I once asked one of our local staff why there was so much anger towards the Ebola Response.

She answered: “My husband was killed in a massacre in Beni. At that time, all I wanted was some organization to come protect us from the killings, but no international organization came. I have had 3 children die of malaria. No international organization has ever come to work in this area to make sure we have access to health care or clean water. But now Ebola arrives, and all the organizations come because Ebola gives them money.

“If you cared about us, you would ask us our priorities. My priority is security and making sure my children don’t die from malaria or diarrhea. My priority is not Ebola, that is your priority”.

Last week the Ebola outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. There are still many questions about what impact this will have on the actual response.

What we do see is that even more money is being directed towards the Ebola Response, but if there is no change in the way the Ebola outbreak is managed, if it doesn’t gain the trust of the population, more money won’t do anything. It will just create more problems.

One of the greatest frustrations about this whole situation is that there is not only an effective Ebola vaccine available, there are also experimental treatments for Ebola cases. These are tools that were much less readily available in the West African Ebola outbreak, but if the population doesn’t trust the Ebola Response, these tools will never be able to be used to their full potential.

In February 2019, two of MSF’s Ebola Treatment Centres in the epicenter of the outbreak were attacked. We didn’t know who attacked the centres or why, and as we couldn’t anymore ensure the security of our staff or our patients, MSF took the painful decision to stop all activities in that specific area. We were forced to review the problems we had been facing, and how we wanted to change our response to the Ebola outbreak.

We determined that we needed to work more closely with the communities, and that we needed to listen to and respond to the health priorities of the affected communities. We began providing access to free health care for all illnesses that were affecting the population, like malaria, measles and diarrhea.

We began building wells, so that when we told the population they needed to wash their hands to prevent the spread of Ebola, they had water to do so. We set up centers for suspect Ebola cases in local health centres, so that suspect Ebola patients could be cared for in their community, instead of having to travel to other areas for testing and isolation.

And by addressing the actual needs and health priorities of the population, we began gaining the trust of the community. Sadly, this approach has still not been adopted by the overall Ebola Response, and there remains an overall mistrust of the response.

In many areas people still refuse to go to Ebola treatment centres when they are sick, and other people still refuse the vaccine. When I see families and communities ripped apart by Ebola, it makes me so sad. It didn’t have to be like this, and unless a drastic change happens in the management of the Ebola Response, the outbreak is not going to end anytime soon.

One year into the outbreak and more than 2600 people have gotten sick with Ebola, and more than 1700 people have died of the disease.

Today, at the one-year anniversary of the outbreak, my thoughts are with all of those people that have been affected by the illness. I hope that change comes soon.

Trish Newport is the deputy manager of MSF’s (Doctors Without Borders) Ebola programmes in the DRC. She reflects on the outbreak and the response over the past year.

  • This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of CodeBlue.

You may also like